We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on FemaleNetwork.com. By continued use, you agree to our privacy policy and accept our use of such cookies. Find out more here.
Remember Me
Oops! Sorry!
A message has been sent to
johnjones@gmail.com
Click on the link in the email to set a new password.
Click on the link to activate your account.
^^ I'm not asking you to change your vote or even to rationalize your choice. Choice mo yan and hindi kita pinapakialaman. I'm just asking you that when you make statements, please be careful to stick to the facts. Tayong mga Filipinos, masyado tayong emotional so it's easy for us to make emotional statements. Pero if you will work in other countries or work with other nationalities, just a tip to be mindful of your statements. Ang mga ibang lahi, lalo na from the first world countries, wala silang paki how emotional you can get. They will always look at your credibility based on how factual your statements are. Again, kahit review-him mo pa lahat ng posts ko, hindi ko pinapa-explain sayo bakit gusto mo si Duterte. Pinapa-explain ko lang ang basis na sabihin mo na "kulelat" ang economy natin because it isn't.
^fyi, ricardo saludo is part of the GMA cabinet. Manila Times is also known a pro-GMA, pro-Marcos and anti-Aquino daily. May bias na kaagad. I'd like to see if there's are any other sources aside from Manila Timas who attributes the economic gains to GMA.
It has been the primary spin of Noynoy through his “daang matuwid” (straight path) catchphrase that all reforms including those involving the fiscal system were all initiated under his term.The main claim was that fiscal transparency initiated by his Rasputin, Budget Secretary Butch Abad, resulted in making the government more responsive to the needs of Filipinos. Not so, says international credit watchdog Moody’s Investors Service which said in a recent report on the Philippines that it was during the term of former President Gloria Arroyo, who has been under detention on alleged irregularities for nearly the entire term of Noynoy, without any conviction which the United Nations recently brought up with the government.Noynoy specifically noted that reforms initiated under his administration had led to the country obtaining investment grade from key credit rating agencies that, aside from Moody’s are Fitch Ratings and Standard and Poor’s.The Moody’s report, however, acknowledged the Arroyo administration for having started the institutional reforms in the government of which in effect Noynoy has been the beneficiary.“Many of these changes resulted from a public financial management reform drive that was first mooted during the administration of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo in the mid-2000s,” Moody’s said.Among reforms that Moody’s cited as having been initiated during the term of Arroyo were “institutional improvements” including “performance-informed” budgeting that has improved expenditure oversight, various tax administration measures that have boosted compliance, and enhanced procurement processes that have led to cost savings.Moody’s also called the attention of Noynoy that several measures that would have “institutionalized” reforms were not prioritized during his term such as the Public Financial Management Bill, the pending Tax Incentive Management and Transparency Act, or the revisions to the Build Operate Transfer Law.Moody’s is now looking at the next administration to cover lost ground. Political noise has increased ahead of general elections next year, but we do not expect a reversal in the trend improvement in institutional strength. Reform momentum has been largely sustained, leading to improved assessments of competitiveness and governance,” Moody’s said.The report echoed worries of economists about underspending in the administration of Noynoy limiting growth prospects.It said bottlenecks in fiscal expenditure have continued to weigh on growth and could threaten the government’s capacity to meet its goal of increasing infrastructure spending to at least five percent of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2016.Moody’s said fiscal underspending weighed on overall growth earlier in the year, but should provide greater support to the economy in coming quarters.Moody’s said the government-related components of GDP — comprising government consumption and public construction, which includes infrastructure development — contracted two percent in the first quarter compared to a year ago.It noted that the resiliency of the economy was coming more from the private sector rather than government policies.“While the fiscal impulse has been uneven, the private sector’s contribution to growth has been stable largely due to robust household consumption, which has been aided in recent quarters by lower food and fuel prices, and despite the negative contribution from net exports,” it said.“Private investment — as defined by gross fixed capital formation excluding public construction — has also remained buoyant,” it added.Moody’s added that remittance inflows have continued to support private consumption despite a slowing of receipts from the Middle East, whose petroleum and service industries rely to a large extent on Filipino labor.“In the first seven months of the year, Overseas Filipinos’ Cash Remittances grew 4.8 percent year-on-year, slightly below the 5.9 percent increase recorded for the full year in 2014. Over the same period, the growth in remittances from the Middle East, which account for roughly one-fifth of all remittances, slowed to eight percent as compared to a 22.7 percent rise last year,” it said.
Kulelat ang economy... may mga utang tayo?Hindi kanga nag babasa ng news sis.Nag papautang napo tayo ngayun worldwide. Paki search po... Thanks
^mei-mei, since you're an economist, maybe you can comment on something I've heard and read. I've been wanting to get insights of an actual economist about this. Our economy is doing well right now because of GMA, she focused on the economy and Aquino is actually taking credit of what GMA's hard work. http://www.manilatimes.net/the-economy-is-strong-despite-the-president/81318/
Sa Facts tayo..Can you site some facts about the Mamasapano and Yolanda? I know medyo masakit ang FACTS about this issue..but please enlighten our minds bakit hindi si Mar ang sisihin dito?
Para sa akin ito ang reason kung bakit mas lalong bumabango ngayon si Duterte..mas klaro ang plataporma niya para sa karamihan lalo na sa mga mahihirap
May plataporma pala si Duterte??? Hahahahaha
Sobrang dami ng sources, sis. Katamad mag copy paste dito. You can always search and read for yourself online. If you're a vigilant citizen, you will. Just saying.
There is clearly no way na mananalo si Mar, unless may dayaang mangyari
