@ sis lalee888
thanks for saying that, gusto ko din kasi maintindihan san nangagaling yung backlash.
but can you elaborate more? sorry sis medyo slow ako wahahaha
San part nagtake advantage? Were the locals exploited in a way kasi hinde nila alam para san ang shoot?
Yung theme ba ng shoot should be different, mga suot nila?
Ano yung pwedeng ginawang different ng team as they are educated and privileged ones here.
Insensitive lang ba ako sa culture ng iba? 
Nababasa ko kasi sa comments sa fb like kita sa pic yung agwat ng poor at rich, pero in my eyes, hinde naman ganun, I see beautiful people, the couple and the locals.
pero pinakanatatawa ako sa comment wala silang makitang 'love' between the couple (mas alam pa nila eh) lols 
again, not a fan of Billy and Coleen, ang nega ng vibes nila sa public, naOA-an pa ako kay Billy pagdating kay Coleen haha, pero nagandahan ako sa sets of photos nila, at nagandahan na din ako kay Coleen dati kasi hinde
Hmmm.. let me try sis! But before I do, I want to say my analogy of human behavior is the REACTION of the people who saw the shoot. I am in no way crucifying Metrophoto or the couple Billy and Colleen. I've seen it happen all too often that photographers, as the ones portraying the message, misrepresent images to deliver a different message. I'm not saying this is the case here but really we don't know what they discussed diba? Like what were the pegs or the overall idea/concept for the photoshoot. But the common sense and safe assumption is, alam nila (every single one of them - photographer, and the couple) yung concept and agreed concept yun kasi it was supposed to be a pre-nup, and they happily shared it in social media. So that means they all approved the concept.
Now here's where it gets bad. Whatever their intentions were -- conscious intention or unconscious -- they delivered a message that was in bad taste, causing a major public backlash.
hmmm.. siguro to explain, an example is 'White privilege' (and note they are half-white, so exxxxxxtra bad for them) --- where white people, just have an advantage over others in a lot of ways that are NOT SO OBVIOUS in society, but are factually there. Now there is a thing called VolunTOURISM, where privileged white folks go on volunteering missions abroad, usually in places like Haiti, Guatemala, and countries in Africa (factually, all white countries are developed and not poor, and colored countries are poor). And bad na ng idea because the BAIT to volunteer is to get a chance to tour/vacation with a purpose. If there was NO TOUR involved, would this white person still volunteer? Is the intent PURE from the bottom of their heart? Then this white person will take a selfie, or a group picture or an "action shot" with the locals in the African city. If the white person examines their intention -- it may be 'harmless' like "i want to look cool for Insta" but often times, its because they have the White Saviour Complex. It's in bad taste. Unconsciously, in bad taste.
Here's a short clip about it:https://www.facebook.com/ajplusenglish/videos/1094334604041379/and a quote from an article about White Saviour Complex:"White Savior Complex" If you're unfamiliar, the term is used to describe the white Westerners who travel to third world countries and make the entire affair an exercise in self-congratulatory #sacrifice. And here's a link to explain it (funny entertaining and short read):https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/white-savior-barbie-hilariously-parodies-volunteer-selfies-in-africa_us_570fd4b5e4b03d8b7b9fc464Now put that into perspective in the case of Colleen and Billy. Their photos were self-absorbed and self-congratulatory, and self-aware (a lot of SELF there) -- narcissistic in a context of people who were NOT self-aware, NOT self-congratulatory, and NOT self-absorbed. To top it off, the people were not asked for nor given consent to be in the PHOTOS, photos that generated publicity and money for the couple because they are celebrities after all.
Imagine pa, the backlash on WHITE SAVIOUR complex is huge, even if the people were actually going there to do some type of 'good' kasi nga it highlights the privilege of whites, but DOES NOTHING GOOD for those others in the picture.
Anyway, ang haba na ng post ko, but lastly, and in case my post was TL;DR (too long, did not read) for others. Here's a similar but unrelated note on this.
TL; DR http://helloflo.com/survivor-vs-victim-why-choosing-your-words-carefully-is-important/When you call a person a 'victim' they feel helpless and powerless and highlights how they were abused, how they could not take charge of the situation. When they are called 'survivor', it empowers them and helps them internalize that their ordeal was one they rose above of. Similarly,[/u] images have an impact on those who see them, and those who were IN THEM. The images of this supposed pre-nup REMINDS the locals they are poor and further highlights their lifestlye gap from the subjects (the couple). It also TELLS the couple they are privileged, beautiful, able to travel to exotic places, etc.
