Vhong Navarro thread 2

[Britney]

Pano kaya kung si Manny Pacquiao at hindi si Vhong yun. Big fish yun at malamang magbabayad na lang si Manny. He he.

[junepets]

^magkumpare ata sila ni Pacquiao sis..
but we never know..
kapag pera pinagusapan.. kung magkupare pa rin sila..

[hunny_ally]

Update: accdg to atty. calleja, totoo daw na hinihingi ni Deniece yung kopya ng CCTV footage kasi nga nanakawan daw yung unit ni DC kinaumagahan after nung incident with Vhong.

Which sounds more st*pid. Hihingi ka ng CCTV to prove a nakawan and hindi to bolster your rape allegation. Parang mas concerned pa siya na nakawan siya than na-rape

[rave21lala]

^^^^di ko rin maintindihan yung gusto niya iparating, tagalog na nga wrong grammar pa rin. at pano siya mananakawan eh diba bumalik pa sila don ng 3am para maglinis? pero sabagay mahilig nga pala siya magiwan ng pinto na hindi nakalock.

sana meron din sila cctv video sa 2nd floor hallway.

[marge070407]

wow nanakawan coincidence na naman ba naiwan unlocked ang door? aba iha makakalimutin ka na yata at 22

[rave21lala]

Kakabasa ko lang sa PEP ng interview ni Deniece after niya magfile ng case against Vhong. may nakakatawa na naman siyang sinabi:

Ano naman ang natutunan niya sa pangyayaring ito?

“Ang natutunan ko rito, ang mali ay mananatiling mali. Sa mata ng prinsipyo, ang mali ay mananatiling mali,” sabi ni Deniece.

[bettyboop1322]

^Ano daw?! lol

[mango_shake]

sorry! shunga lang siguro ako pero what the heck does that mean? lol.


baka naman kaya naging 2M ang singil kay vhong kasi sa kanya pinashoulder yun nanakaw "daw".. lol! kaloka talaga reasoning niya.. 

[marge070407]

tawang tawa ako sa isang meme post na may pic ni DC sabi ang pera daw na makukuha kay vhong ay idodonate daw niya sa yolanda hahaha

[KVsWahmmy]

good points by Teddy Locsin Jr., and funny too. : http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/blogs/opinions/01/30/14/vhong-navarro-case-incisive-questions-vastly-expanded

Here are the first three questions he raised:

(1) Why was Vhong’s first date with Deniece in her apartment--and at 10:45 p.m.? The first date, mind you. Most of us don’t get to peck a date’s cheek at the door of the building after the tenth date, if we are not dropped after the first. No one should be that lucky.

(2) Why did Vhong come back, and I stress the word ‘come’, for seconds at 10:45 pm again? Why always in the dead of night? Is one of them undead or insomniac?

(3) What did she serve him in the first date that he had come again at the same late hour? It wasn’t food because the second time he brought the kakanin; though he turned out to be the main course.

[sugardrop]

What's "mata ng prinsipyo"?

[runawaywithyou]

^Yan din ang hindi ko magets!

[SnowBall]

So, hindi nga malayo yung sinasabi ng iba na hindi lang daw talaga nagkasunduan sa presyo.

Kung baga si Vhong, akala niya makakalibre siya, eh gusto naman ni Cedric may presyo si Deniece.

at yung kapatid ni cedric, malamang, silang magkapatid ang bugaw.

[solepurplelife]

Seriously, nagtataka ako bakit sya ganyan? May problema ba sya sa pag-iisip? So far mga napapanood kong interviews nya kakaiba talaga pinagsasabi nya.


Anyway, she denied the retoke thing.

“Hindi ko po kailangan ’yun. Bata pa po ako, four years, five years ago, siyempre po nagkakaroon ng improvement.

 “Alam ko gagawin at gagawin ng mga tao dahil gusto nilang masira ang pagkatao ng isang taong inosente.”

http://www.philstar.com/psn-showbiz/2014/01/31/1284950/sablay-sumagot-deniece-binusalan-na-ng-mga-abogado-isyu-sa

[marge070407]

may bago pala siyang posts sa IG. infairness tagalog na hehe

[marge070407]

grabe dineny niya pa ang retoke lalo tuloy nawalan credibility

[junepets]

bigla tuloy ako napaisip..
kung totoo nga na hindi nagkasundo sa presyo..
baka initialy.. 200k ang PF ni deniece..
hanggang sa naging 2M sya.
hmmmmm...

and natandaan ko yun sabi ni CL dati..
'ikaw ang nagpalaki nito'..
does this mean... after lang talaga sila sa pera.
kung nagbayad na lang si Vhong.. ayos na lahat?

parang di ko na nga makitaan ng revenge kung ganitong angulo titingnan..

[rave21lala]

^^^^dapat lang talaga wag na siya pagsalitain dahil nahuhuli ang kasinungalingan niya sa sarili niyang bibig. pero humanda siya pag humarap na siya sa korte, wala ng magsasalita para sa kanya don. baka bigla siyang mapaamin na lang.

[pjiyeon]

feeling ko nga pera lang talaga habol nila ke vhong and not really for revenge since there's no need to ask for money if it's only for revenge.. sa mga pangyayari hindi nila agad maiisip to ask for compensation kung narape talaga ang lola mo..

[ginger_ale]

MEL STA. MARIA | How (not) to perform a 'citizen's arrest' - Hint: Do NOT do what they did to Vhong
http://www.interaksyon.com/article/79842/mel-sta-maria--how-not-to-perform-a-citizens-arrest---hint-do-not-do-what-they-did-to-vhong


Generally, there should be no exertion of physical force in making a citizen's arrest. But anyone making an arrest, provided it's a valid one, must prepare for it because, by nature, nobody would want to be arrested. Resistance is expected. If force is to be used at all, it should be only to the extent reasonably necessary for the apprehension. An arresting citizen has no right to maul and beat up a person while arresting him.

Under our criminal laws, any serious injury made by one on another will always be a crime unless the injuries to another were a result of self defense on the part of the injuring party. If there were more than four well-built men who "arrested" only one individual, would the claim of self defense by these overpowering men be believable?

And if the answer is a "no", should not these abusive men, once they get to the police station to deliver the "arrested," be arrested themselves for committing the crime of serious physical injuries. The mere sight of a hapless and battered “arrested” person is enough personal knowledge that an offense has just been committed in justifying a warrantless arrest or even a "citizen's arrest".

Following the developments of Vhong Navarro's mauling case may indeed have some useful purpose for all of us, after all. Considering the issues involved - propriety of a citizen's arrest, use of brute force, police negligence or incompetence, the adequacy of our justice system, attempted rape or possible criminal frame-ups, conspiracies - we might learn a thing or two about our own rights and on the possible ways to protect ourselves should these situations, God forbid, happen to any of us.