I had myself quoted before for term critical illness insurance from Sun Life (the Life Assure product) and BPI-Philam (the Life Protect Health). Although not exact, I adjusted the figures so the comparison is equal. Both products give you the face amount upon diagnosis of critical illness or upon death, whichever is first. This is for a 31-year-old female, non-smoker:
Sun Life Life Assure:
-Plain term insurance with level premium for 5 years, then increases again
-500k critical illness/death insurance
-P4,195 annual premium for 1st 5 years, then P4,685 the next 5 years
BPI-Philam Life Protect Health:
-Gives back 50% of premiums paid if no claims within the 10-year coverage
-500k critical illness/death insurance
-P13,507.94 annual premium
Again, since this is the term insurance thread, I'm going to give figures if you invest the difference instead of giving it to an insurance company.
If you get the plain term insurance instead of the one with cash back, then invest the difference (P9,312.94 per year for the first 5 years, then P8,822.94 the next 5) in let's say
Philequity Fund with a 10-year average historical return of 18% per year, you would end up with P284,774.01 after 10 years. That's already nearly 60% of the 500k insurance coverage you bought in the first place. It's self-insurance money for a personal health fund that won't disappear/expire with a 10-year-contract.
If you get the one with cash back, sure, you'll get half of what you paid, but its value would also be halved due to inflation pegged at 3-4% per year. The extra P67,539.70 you would've paid and would get back would only be worth around P20k+ after 10 years.
So which one do you want, the one where you "throw away money" for term insurance then end up with 284k, or the one where it's "not tapon pera" and you "get cash back" but its value is P20k?