watch now

Author Topic: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)  (Read 129120 times)

mameejhy

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #500 on: February 16, 2014, 12:16:21 pm »
Hoy Cedric Lee kahit  lola  magkakamalisya sa halik mong yan! :D


Hahahahaha!!! :D

aicute12

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #501 on: February 16, 2014, 04:21:59 pm »
Atty Fortun already resigned as CL's spokesperson!!!!!!! :)

pretty empress

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #502 on: February 16, 2014, 05:13:33 pm »
^wow sis good news..  what's the reason?

swiTsuplada

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #503 on: February 16, 2014, 05:27:43 pm »
Siguro mismo siya eh hindi na naniniwala na malakas ang kaso ng kliyente niya. ;D

Myealexis21

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #504 on: February 16, 2014, 05:36:37 pm »
^As per his statement may breach of contract.  Kase di ba nagsalita si CL explaining the kiss (edit: Si DC din pala nag-explain about the kiss).  But maybe nagdahilan na lang si Fortun kase kung talagang naniniwala sya kahit may breach of contract pa, tutuloy niya pa rin yung work niya as spokeperson ni CL.

Good luck sa kampo ni CL. Sabi na kaseng wag na maingay, nagsalita pa rin! Kulit yan tuloy napala.  lalong naging hopeless ang case nila. 
« Last Edit: February 16, 2014, 07:07:51 pm by Myealexis21 »

swiTsuplada

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #505 on: February 16, 2014, 05:47:53 pm »
Yeah I saw it from Buzz ng Bayan. I agree with you sis, feeling ko alibi na lang 'yun. Tulad nga ng sabi ng ilang sis dito pati family niya nadadamay na. Nakakaawa din siya na nadamay pa sa gulo ng kliyente niya. But I believe, hindi niya na kayang idepensa ang sobrang obvious na kapalpakan ng kampo nila CL.

Iba pa din ang peace of mind.

aicute12

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #506 on: February 16, 2014, 05:48:11 pm »
eto yung letter oh. (c) abs-cbn

Below is the full statement of Fortun:

Dear Cedric,

I had been engaged as your spokesman with the objective of being the media’s contact person in all legal as well as factual issues as may be consistent with the thrust of your legal counsels. In this regard, I had faithfully complied with this mandate for the past 12 days, even at peril to my own reputation as a lawyer.

Together with this mandate was an agreement that no statements shall by anybody from your group without the consent/approval of your counsels and/or spokesman. This has been breached last night.

My personal desire to help you notwithstanding the adverse publicity that you have been receiving is precisely to educate the public on the need to temper their emotions in light of your Constitutional rights to due process, to counsel of your choice, to present a valid and lawful defense, and to confront your accusers in the proper legal setting.

The past several days had made me realize that this country is NOT YET READY to accept these legal concepts, to which I squarely lay the blame on inaccurate reportage and the unprofessional actions of certain law enforcement agencies. That being the case and for the earlier reason mentioned, and in light of my inability to perform the functions for which I was hired, I regret that I must resign as your spokesman effective immediately.

Nonetheless, and in light of the lessons I have learned during my short stint as your spokesman, I will henceforth be devoting some of my time to: (i) ask congressmen to enact legislation so that ALL PERSONS who MAY be facing criminal prosecution be duly informed of their rights (e.g. to remain silent, to the presence of a lawyer etc.) before they are interviewed by TV networks.

People accused of crimes also have rights which need to be protected against media frenzy and unfair pre-judgments; and (ii) ask the Supreme Court to resolve the issues in respect of the Constitutionality of the Anti-Cybercrime Law, in order to address the matter of cyber-libels against Filipino citizens. People do have the right to express their opinions about issues, but such freedom does not grant a license to bully, hurl invectives or otherwise destroy one’s reputation without factual basis.

I wish you all the best in your case, and may justice prevail.

Very truly yours,

Raymond Fortun

gracita13

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #507 on: February 16, 2014, 06:03:29 pm »
^^true! nakakatawa walang malisya daw ang kiss na yun,naghaharutan lang daw sila at para i-comfort si dc,.buset "rape"victim haharutin nya? eh bat hindi na lang yung ate nya ang hinarot nya! LOL!!!

rave21lala

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #508 on: February 16, 2014, 06:53:09 pm »
nahuli na ko sa balita. hehe! so nagresign na si Atty. Fortun?! nagdadahilan na lang yan, malamang narealize niya wala na lusot yung client niya.

san ba nagbigay ng statement si CL?

tiggerlily

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #509 on: February 16, 2014, 07:25:52 pm »
alam ko na. nakita nya kasi yung result ng check-up ni deniece kaya umayaw na sya.

seriously, paano mo nga ba idedefend ang client na sirang sira na nga ang credibility tapos e ayaw pa sumunod?

Msfi

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #510 on: February 16, 2014, 08:00:12 pm »
Bakit ganun ang words ni Atty Fortun, "People accused of crimes".? eh Di ba supposedly eh nasa panig sya ng victims. Pati is atty Fortun parang naguluhan na din yata.

Myealexis21

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #511 on: February 16, 2014, 08:09:59 pm »
^Sis accused ata sila dun sa pambubugbog and extortion.  Yan ata yung countercharges ni Vhong Navarro. 

Msfi

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #512 on: February 16, 2014, 09:49:55 pm »
^oo nga sis, but they've been protraying as the victims from the start. I was thinking he should have stick to that.

sugardrop

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #513 on: February 16, 2014, 10:29:23 pm »
^
The point is they have been accused of a crime even though they claim to have been the victims. And it could also be a general term, not just for his ex-clients.

miyam210

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #514 on: February 17, 2014, 12:17:29 am »
Palusot na lang ni fortune cookie ang pag-resign.  He just chose to leave a sinking ship.  Baka kasi mapanot din siya like calleja sa kakaisip kung paano mag-imbento ng excuses at kasinungalingan.

alice_alice

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #515 on: February 17, 2014, 01:06:44 am »
Nakakalurki ang statement ni CL ah, di daw type si DC kasi "mataba" yung wife daw niya 22 inches ang waistline, mayabang talaga itong lalaking ito.

Good move na rin kay fortun ang umalis dyan sa kampo nila CL nadudungisan lang reputation niya at masasama lang siya sa paglubog ng mga clients niya.

SunsetDream

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #516 on: February 17, 2014, 06:08:34 am »
^woah talaga sinabi yun ni CL? Saang interview sis, do you have a link?

Leven

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #517 on: February 17, 2014, 07:29:27 am »
Palusot na lang ni fortune cookie ang pag-resign.  He just chose to leave a sinking ship.  Baka kasi mapanot din siya like calleja sa kakaisip kung paano mag-imbento ng excuses at kasinungalingan.

akala siguro niya maipagpalit niya sa money yung kasinungalingan..not this time fortune cookie..kitang kita na mga ebidensiya e...It just shows that money can buy lawyers..not all but most of them. they are one LIAR SPECIALIST..just sayngi
« Last Edit: February 17, 2014, 09:26:17 am by Leven »

hyeuna03

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #518 on: February 17, 2014, 08:49:23 am »
I am sure Atty. Fortune is scratching his head at the moment.. this is my message to you.

Dear Atty. Fortun, please contact me ASAP, need your help... my husband caught me on the same situation (kissing a man inside the elevator) and I was trying to convince him that it is not a passionate kiss and that is a "non-issue"  ;D

Serioulsy Atty. Fortun, how would you explain the sequences of scenes in the video footage? don't tell us made in china ha, pirated!! paki explain, lub yu!!  ;D
hahaha dami ko tawa..

izabelle

  • Guest
Re: Vhong Navarro (Thread 3)
« Reply #519 on: February 17, 2014, 10:54:37 am »
maybe he wants peace of mind.. Obvious naman sinungalin ang clients nya. Alam nya siguro mahihirapan sya idepensa ang mga tao na mismong dahilan bakit din sila sirang sira sa public.

 

Latest Stories

Load More Stories
Close