Aquino-Roxas. Estrada-Binay. Gordon-Fernando. Teodoro-Manzano. Villar-Legarda. These ten names should be on any good citizen’s mind these days, not just because it’s already campaign season, but because this is one of the few times when we shouldn’t mind being bombarded by politicians’ voices. It’s better to hear candidates speak, than to imagine that their silences make them the least of all evils.
Yes, this could all be only talk—but only when we’re clear about what we want and what our elected leaders stand for can we also hold them liable for breaking their promises. We know the power we hold as citizens—we’ve been through the 1986 EDSA Revolution and EDSA Dos—and while we can be proud of taking to the streets to protest the shortcomings of those in power, it makes sense to choose our leaders more intelligently to begin with. Here, we give you a rundown of the issues that are important to consider as you make the most crucial of choices for the coming elections.
The urgency that is the environment. With Ondoy and Pepeng fresh in our memories, we’re more likely to listen to what candidates say about the environment. What every country—developing countries like ours in particular—needs is sustainable development as theorized by Maximo V. Kalaw, who said that our government must use the environment as the core of its vision for development. Sustainable development sees the log ban and the anti-smoke belching campaign, garbage collection and climate change, as aspects of a bigger picture that’s informed by the more important issues of capitalism, political will, urban planning, and everyday living. Because the recent typhoons have hit even homes that used to withstand storms, the issue of sustainable development is at the forefront of many citizens’ minds—at this time more than any other.
American soldiers in our midst: The VFA question. Remember Nicole? She was one of the many women who suffered at the hands of American soldiers brought to our shores by the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA). Election season is a good time to remember Nicole, and to realize that many women are still being victimized by the industry of prostitution that follows the presence of American soldiers wherever it goes. We must be reminded of this fact as well: the reason behind the VFA was the anti-terrorist project after 9/11. It is now 2010. Will a new leader see fit to adapt policy that suits the current clime?
Foreign debt: Who pays for this? The answer is simple: you do. And at the rate we’re going, even your yet-to-be-born-or-imagined offspring are already in debt. We are made to believe that there’s no way out of our national debt, and that the respectful thing to do is to pay it back. We are in an endless cycle of taking on more debt in order to pay for existing ones, when there is a worldwide call for all third world debts to be repealed and for all countries like the Philippines to be considered debt-free. Instead of supporting this call, past governments have chosen to pay. Though this issue has been neglected in favor of other problems that get more airtime, it’s one that is here to stay, and our potential leaders should have a plan for dealing with it.
You have a right to speak, woman! The number of human rights violations and politically motivated killings has been at its highest with the current government. The recent crisis in Maguindanao has driven home the point that no one—man or woman, journalist or activist, civilian or student—is spared. Any potential leader must not only respond to this injustice, but must also prove to be open to criticism and respectful of the people’s rights to speech and assembly. In a democracy, there is no place for violent dispersals and extrajudicial disappearances; in any democracy, any woman should be able to air her opinions without fear.
ChaCha by any other name… The reasons behind wanting to change the constitution may be correct; we might all even agree that our democracy is dysfunctional. But this doesn’t mean that charter change must be done now, and quickly. The decision to change our political system to a parliamentary one has to be treated with objectivity, and the process needs to be respected. If we can’t trust the people who are pushing for charter change, how can we even imagine this change to be a good thing?
by Princess Dchanted on 2010-02-12 09:16:11
by sonncza on 2010-02-18 08:30:02
by sonncza on 2010-02-18 08:37:56
by Michael on 2010-02-18 18:04:33
by mimiku on 2010-02-19 15:23:22