<< Nancy Jane talks about her new album
Thundercats are gooo! >>

10,000 BC

Mar 6, 2008 by FN Blogger Tisha Alvarez

tisha_10000bc.jpgSpoiler alert!

For a movie with so much promise, for one that was supposed to be an awe-inspiring adventure, 10,000 BC was, to be honest, kind of dragging. (I was tempted to name this post "10,000 B-Zzzz" but it wasn’t that bad.)

In a nutshell: A group of bad guys attacks a tribe, enslaves a bunch of the tribespeople, including a pretty blue-eyed chick, who happens to be the object of the lead character’s affections. Lead character goes off on a quest to save said chick, picking up some supporters along the way. They follow the kidnapped peeps all the way to the end of the world, where a civilization with a pseudo-god uses the conquered people to build pyramids and temples. I think you can pretty much guess how this ends.

How can you go wrong with mammoths, a sabertooth tiger, ostrich-like creatures running amok in the jungle, tribesmen chasing after a group of men on “four-legged demons” (i.e., horses) across snow-covered mountains and vast desserts? Well, for starters, you could have a bland, cliche-filled script. It seemed like the actors were struggling to squeeze some depth and emotion out of words that lacked them. I know this was supposed to be 12,000 years ago, but a script filled with two-syllable words? Come on. Even the lead character’s “rousing” speech to rally the hunters-turned-warriors wasn’t all that inspiring. It kinda made me miss, “Tonight we dine in hell!” (Now there was a good movie. Such a simple plot but it was still highly entertaining. Yes, it can be done.)

The film is not without its merits, particularly the technical aspects. It would’ve been way better if it had been tighter–they could’ve shortened or cut out a few scenes. And a little more blood would’ve been nice. It was a bit too Narnia, people being killed left and right without any blood being spilled. (I am not a fan of gore; I was just searching for something a little more…realistic?) But hey, it’s got a G rating so it’s great for the kiddies.

I’m not going to say it was a complete waste of time–at the very least, it added to my list of dream pets: a sabertooth tiger to go with my polar bear and lion. If you’re gonna go and see it, be prepared to be impressed by the special effects, the scenery, Camilla Belle’s baby blues...and not much else.

Tags:


0 Comments

Add Comment
    be the first to post a comment...

Most Read GRAPEVINE of the week

  • Bench Blackout: Dark, whimsical, quite controversial

    All roads led to Araneta Coliseum last July 25, as men and women alike (all above 18) promptly arrived for Blackout, the Bench Denim and Underwear Sho...

  • Regine V is Kim Sam Soon

    We've heard from our friends from PEP that Regine Velasquez is leading the cast of GMA-7's My Name Is Kim Sam Soon , the remake of the Korean...

  • Kim Chiu is turning 18!

    Isn't it sweet that Kim is getting even prettier? It feels like only yesterday when she entered Kuya's house during the first Pinoy Big Brothe...

Random GRAPEVINE Articles

More GRAPEVINE Articles

  • Nancy Jane talks about her new album

    We got to talk to Nancy Jane Castiglione during the IP E-Games Domination II which she hosted last week with Tado and Ramon Bautista at the SMX Conven...

  • We're watching Urduja! Are you?

    The trailer for Urduja, the first full-length animation film to be produced by a local production company, has been out since December last year--you ...

  • No goodbyes for Dr. Izzie Stevens

    Apparently there were rumors that Katherine Heigl will be leaving Grey's Anatomy, but our favorite doctor has dismissed such reports, which all ca...

Recent Comments

Recently Active MyFN Members

Go to MyFN

Recently Active MyFN Groups

Go to FN Groups

From the FN Archives

EXPLORE ARCHIVE
   Show All
down
ADVERTISEMENTS